Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:42

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What are the popular niches to talk about as a content creator on the social media platform?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Blue Jackets acquire forwards Charlie Coyle and Miles Wood from Colorado - NHL.com
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What should I do if a girl whom I love asks me to be her friend?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Do humans know everything they need to know?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Most-complete Stegosaur skull ever found forces rewrite of dinosaur history - Earth.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
The FCC is cracking down on EchoStar’s deployment of 5G. - The Verge